patching...
Update: For the latest local news, follow us on Facebook and Twitter
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
The Death of Truth

What Would Jesus Do in the Voting Booth

Rumor has it that a fellow Greendale resident posted a blog on Patch that questioned a Christian’s dedication to Scott Walker.  At the end of his blog he directed our attention to Walker’s policy changes that appear to take money from those less fortunate.  To my amazement, it would appear that President Obama must have read his blog.  In his address at the National Prayer Breakfast he quoted Jesus, “For unto whom much is given, much shall be required.”  Prior to that he had also said, “love thy neighbor as thyself”, all to describe his policy of fairness.  The apparent fairness Christ expects of Christians, the taking from others and giving to those you feel worthy. 

Reading and quoting the Bible is very different then actually understanding the meaning that it imparts.  I am by no means a biblical scholar, nor am I priest, minister or pastor.  I have however, given much thought to my ability to vote for specific individuals and how that reflects on my religion. 

No one can argue that Christ spread the message of loving your neighbor.  I will also agree that he expects the blessings we have been given to be shared.  Yet, this is a very simplistic view of Christ’s message.  For instance, in the first passage used by Obama, the surrounding text not only reflects on the material but also on the spiritual.  As much as Christ expected us to help the poor, those blessings he has given us should be used for the greater purpose of expanding his Church of believers here on earth. 

The same could be said for ‘love your neighbor as yourself’.  If, as a Christian, I strive for eternal life through faith in Christ, the truest love I could therefore share with my neighbor is that saving faith.  It is not enough to assume Christ expected us to simply feed and cloth people.  He expected us to baptize all nations. 

The problem that I have with quoting Christ as Obama has and as my fellow blogger paraphrased, is that they are not speaking of personal interaction.  They are attempting to impart the words of Christ into the role of a government.  This was never the intent.  In fact, when faced with question regarding the government, Christ differed.  For example, Christ was confronted with whether it was right to pay taxes, he famously said, “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.”  He drew a strict distinction between the earthly and spiritual world.  Christ was not on this earth to establish a political system.  Christians understand that he came as our Savior and to establish his heavenly kingdom.  

In a simple Google search, I found sites for all sides of the political spectrum that attempt to claim Christ was on their side.  The truth is, He would have been on no one’s side.  He had no role in politics and He didn’t want one. 

How then do I justify my conservative beliefs against my Christianity

First, I know that no one is perfect and we have all done wrong.  I will judge a politician based on his overall life and the acts he has committed or acts proven to be committed under his direction.  For instance, I was never a Clinton supporter; however, I didn’t care much about what he did in the oval office as long it didn’t compromise the country (God can judge him for that).  When he lied under oath and broke the laws of our country, then he deserved to be punished like everyone else.  If this John Doe investigation turns up proof that Walker had committed crimes during his political tenure in Milwaukee he will lose my vote.  Not because he did something wrong, but because he actively concealed his crime.  Like I tell my kids, if you do something wrong come clean, covering it will only get you in more trouble. 

Second, I don’t believe the role of the government should be caring for the sick.  There is nothing un-Christian about that.  Instead, I believe that as a nation on a personal level we aught to help each other.  I have seen many good and community beneficial things come out of religious organization.  I have also seen that with every dollar you pay in tax, it must be balanced against the money going in the offering basket or charity organization.  My money is better spent the way I wish and not at the hands of a bureaucrat building a bridge, library or a welfare system corrupt from top to bottom.  If I have not been a good steward of my money, God will judge me for that.  The government can not make an objective claim as to how I can, should or will spend my money in a way that is most Christian. 

I do not view conservatives as being more Christian then liberals or vice versa.  I believe that even within a single congregation (let alone a country) the diversity between cons. and libs. can help to create the stronger organization.  In the end I vote conservative not because God said so; but because I feel it offers the best ability for me to express my Christian faith.

Bren

10:24 am on Friday, February 3, 2012

I don't believe that moral/character values are "conservative." I agree with you that there can be many differences of opinion within a church congregation, I've experienced this myself. The issue with religion is that it is faith-based and therefore open to interpretation. We can each only do our best which is again, open to interpretation, and to employ those values in our daily lives. Pres. Obama said as much, as did you.

Sadly, hypocrisy exists in every faith, where at times a biased interpretation is used to pursue agenda that contradict the very tenet(s) they are supposed to promote.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

10:38 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

I think that Jesus would approve of the Koch Brothers. After all, they provide family sustaining wages to hundreds of thousands of employees and constantly and consistently show up in the top 10 of the world's biggest philanthropers list.

Jason Patzfahl

12:02 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

"J.B." I admire you and all those who have such dedication to their faith - especially as mine has withered over the years. Please understand that I never meant to insult you or your faith in my blog. I simply wanted to point out that I see distinct differences between what is preached in Christianity and the actions that are taken by the political leaders who claim to represent people of the Christian faith.

I will never understand how one can vote for a "morally conservative" candidate who opposes abortion because it "kills the unborn", but will vote to send poor 18 year old "men" to a foreign land to be killed in war - or vote to kill Medicaid, Medicare, BadgerCare, "ObamaCare" or Social Security. Studies show that at least 45,000 Americans die each year because they did not have health care. That just doesn't jive with what I learned when I did pay attention in bible class, ya' know!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bryant Divelbiss

8:23 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

Obamacare seeks to copy England where they are 6 times more likely to die of prostate cancer and 25% of people with curable cancers die. So people will die with or without Obamacare. More importantly, if we follow the Democrats and refuse to deal with costs of those programs, someday, likely in less than 15 years, we will be in a position like Europe where we will be forced to slash them hurting even more than being responsible now like the Ryan Plan was trying to do last year. In the end the progressive policies will be far more harmful, so it would be more difficult to vote with Reid and Obama if you give a care about the future of this country.

Comment_arrow

Bryant Divelbiss

8:29 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

If you are concerned about Badger care you should support Walker. By eliminating the corrupt collective bargaining system we were able to balance the budget while adding money to Badgercare. Being responsible has minimized the cuts to actual services that would have been needed had we not been responsible. Also has prevented losses of teachers or hurting the quality of education in areas with responsible leaders.

Jason Patzfahl

12:04 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

One more thing -
Jesus would not even be allowed in a voting booth in Scott Walker's Wisconsin . . . the chances of a homeless, jobless, "criminal" having a valid ID is pretty damn slim.

Reply
Comment_arrow

SkinnyDude

2:59 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@ Jason
Well, Jason than I would be a strong advocate for the Obama adminsitrations to stop his programs of creating homeless , jobless and criminals .His welfare expansion certainly will increase all those numbers.

Comment_arrow

Craig

4:11 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

What part of FREE ID don't you understand? I was just at the DMV a week ago, my God they have signs everywhere telling you what to do for a free voter ID.
I guess you liked it when the homeless could vote in every ward they wanted?

Comment_arrow

Roger Dodger

4:28 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

glad I decided to check our a few more comments because you nailed it!@haha

J. B. Schmidt

12:58 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@Jason
I was not insulted by your blog. As we have both learned if one is easily insulted, patch blogging may not be a good spot for you. I did see an opening to express my views. I don't think any politicians claim to represent a particular faith. They may claim allegiances to Christianity, as Bren pointed out there are varied distinctions with Christians themselves.

Let me try to address some of the issues you raise. I will leave abortion alone as Christians are divided. As for soldiers, they volunteer and submit their lives to the government. Each war must be taken on a case by case basis as to whether the harm incurred by our men/women in uniform is justified. I would think that protection would be justifiable.
I am not against social welfare. I believe that the government should have a safety net; HOWEVER, it should be extreme. Something like $300 per week for 4 months within any 10 year period. It sounds harsh, but there is no Christian principal that supports freeloading. As a commentator in you last blog pointed out, he received great rehab from a church. I think the private sector can do everything the government is doing without nearly as much waste. The problem with the government model is it creates dependents that tend to vote one particular way. This creates the incentive not to help but encourage more dependents to build a larger voting base. That is why we are advertizing for food stamps and other welfare programs.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bren

1:30 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

J.B., I know people who have been out of work for more than a year--not freeloaders, victims of circumstances far beyond their control. Too much competition for jobs, aging, skills not fresh and no money for training--I also know people with strong resumes who have been passed over for jobs because of their skin color.

I wish this country could move away from the "freeloader" mindset. It's largely inaccurate and unjust.

I would also disagree with you about privatization being more cost-effective. Contracting from the outside cannot replace institutional history/knowledge and commitment. I have spent more time/expense getting contracted services up to and kept up to speed. Most of us don't have time for that anymore.

Concerning building a voter base with social welfare programs, of people I've known who use/have used government assistance to get buy, most believe these are services they pay for through taxes or are their right as American citizens. They do know the difference between "government" and "politics," and many are very aware of local politics especially, because they are the first ones targeted and impacted by cuts.Their votes are largely cast for candidates they believe will improve their lives and communities. In fact, these folks by and large are more knowledgeable about political issues than others of my acquaintance in higher income levels!

J. B. Schmidt

12:59 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@Jason (cont)
As for health care, I disagree that nationalization of health care is appropriate. In Europe they just declined a new prostate drug to men with prostate cancer because of the cost. That doesn't sound very Christian either, yet that is what we are headed for with Obama care. At some point the government cannot fund its liabilities (ie Greece). Therefore, the Christian discipline of being a good steward with your blessings must kick in and ask if national health care is truly prudent. I feel that if some of the government restrictions were lifted on how insurance companies could offer policy, the cost would come down and more would be insured. Again in the private sector could cover the cost, by employers supplementing insurance for those in need or by hospital offering free services. The problem is that when the taxes go up, the funds for free things go away. Look at Henry Ford. He was willing to provide a good wage, housing or food to his employees until the government and unions came demanding more. Then he gave that up.

Lastly, Christ was not a criminal until the day he died, everything prior was circumstantial. As for rest, he may have been 'homeless' but they had money, Judas was their treasurer. Also, while Wisconsin is willing to provide all with a free ID; the Romans did not allow the Jews to participate in politics at all.

Reply

Jason Patzfahl

2:46 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

Henry Ford was adamantly against labor unions and the people who did actual labor - and he was a huge donar to Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party and received a Nazi medal in 1938 . . . what an American capitalist hero!

Reply
Comment_arrow

CowDung

3:00 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

Jason:

Please clarify your claim that Ford was adamantly against the people that did actual labor. Didn't Henry Ford pay his workers twice the pay that the workers in the other car factories were making?

I won't dispute your Hitler/Nazi claims about him, but I do wonder what that has to do with how he compensated his workers...

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

10:32 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@Jason -

Your claim that Ford was against "the people who did actual labor" is historically inaccurate and ludicrous at best. Reading too much revisionist history over on the Daily Kos I see.

Did you know that James Riddle Hoffa, one of the greatest labor leaders in American history, was a staunch conservative and adamantly against public sector unionization? I bet they don't talk about that over on the Daily Kos, do they?

SkinnyDude

2:47 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

Obama sounds like a Hypocrite to use select words of the bible for political gain. I mean It is pretty obvious Jesus would be a pro life. Its like taking his image and hitting it with a sledgehammer to support only some of his words and reject others cause you are smarter in those cases. It's rediculeous .Politics and religion do not mix well. The principles of christ are clearly more evident and fought for on the right . The base of the right is loyal christians.The immorality advocates are on the left.
God would be more of a advocate in todays world. He would not be a canidate . He would be a guide to a world not to a nation. He would be made fun of by the main stream media .I think he would promote the love of mankind and tell us all not to worry and waste a ton of money on global warming HOAX. Afterall, he's got that covered.
God once told one of his angels in the beginning ....
he had created a 24 hour cycle of light and darkness for this planet.....
The angel asks "Well God what are you going to do now?"
God replied " I think I will call it a DAY"

<RIM SHOT ...........ta da!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Roger Dodger

4:34 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

man your are delusional. Let's see jesus main message was compassion, peace, healing, feeding, you know love. Right wingers hate nutritional assistance(feeding those in need), they hate medical reforms or much worse, healing for free in his tradition. Right wingers are rabidly pro war, intollerant and hate some of god's childrean who he made to have a sexual prefrence different then thiers... could go on and on...
Wow to the hypocrites! For it would be better had they never been born!!!

Comment_arrow

SkinnyDude

6:46 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

lol @ roger
Making more and more people dependant on crumbs is your solution. LOL You simply are not solution driven . Resources are not infinite . If you never consider that you are a failure to common sense! At least I am for jobs. You lefties are for programs without a plan to pay for them . You have no creditability in any argument if it isnt based in realistic outcomes. Cradle to grave dependance is FAILURE!

Keith Schmitz

3:45 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

Of course a Christian would support a government that helps the sick, helps the poor, does not abuse prisoners, finds a way to prevent violence at home and overseas. If the government is the means to do it, then why not?

In Christ's time there were no democracies. We have one now, and the government is us.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

3:59 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

Here's what Jesus had to say about it:

“Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’

“They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’

“He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’

Comment_arrow

CowDung

4:07 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

Keith:

How dare you suggest that Christians should impose their religion on others by having the government carry out the commands of Jesus. What happened to the separation of church and state?

Comment_arrow

Bryant Divelbiss

8:12 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

My belief is that the social justice concept, when used to suggest people in the name of religion should support the idea the government must redistribute money, is Demonic. The idea is that we will force people to give money to Government, so the masterminds can set up the Utopia to help the less fortunate. That is Satan's way, force people. We do have a responsibility to help the less fortunate but Christ's way was that we have agency and need to choose to follow his teachings. If God wanted us to be forced to do the "right thing" we would not be given this agency. The beauty in this plan is that we become better people by helping of our own choice, whereas being compelled to give to the Government does nothing for our spiritual growth and does not make us better people. As a side note the giving to the government to help people and fix problems has not been successful nor will it ever be. The chasing of Utopia's never ends well and always takes away liberty. (Read Ameritopa)

Comment_arrow

Bren

8:34 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

Bryant, "that is Satan's way, force people." By your words, legislation which forcibly removes women's access to full health and reproductive services and even some forms of birth control; and to forbid some people to marry because of their gender orientation is also "demonic." And I would agree.

There's no way that Christ would tolerate people ignoring those in need today any more than he would have 2,000 years ago. There's no way to spin that.

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

8:48 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@Bryant Divelbiss...Demonic, utopian, etc. If you don't believe in a utopian society then you don't believe in the United Order of Enoch?

Comment_arrow

Bryant Divelbiss

10:10 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

Lyle, The United Order failed in the early church. Even then people had a choice to join the church and participate not a mandate from a government. In order for that to work all involved would have to have a strong enough faith to work as hard for the community as they do for their own family. Things will have to change greatly before that can work even in the church. It would certainly be more difficult for an even more diverse group to live that way.

Comment_arrow

Bryant Divelbiss

10:26 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

Bren: Christ did "tolerate" people who ignored those in need. He did not come and make everyone help those in need, he taught principles that we have Agency to follow. I do not think having the government help those in need has accomplished much. I am not saying you can’t support wasteful big government and still be Christian, but you can’t say God demands big government. I assume by "reproductive services" you mean abortion which is murder and as such we have a moral obligation to set up laws that prevent that. Marriage is between a man and a woman and Christian teachings support that.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

10:29 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@Randy1949 -

But what did Wisconsin native Willem Dafoe have to say about when he was playing Jesus in Martin Scorsese's 'The Last Temptation of Christ' (1988)? That's what's really important, as David Bowie had a supporting role in that film, remember?

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

10:54 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@Bryant Divelbiss...I know that the United Order didn't survive past President Smith, but it continued in other forms to this very day. The ideology behind it is still alive and well. Some critics claim the Church sold out in order to get statehood.

As far as agency is concerned, I don't think most of the readers of this thread really understand what you are speaking of. One of the major differences in the brothers was that one promoted free agency and the other not. However, that particular belief is not or would not be widely supported by mainstream Christian ideology and dogma. My own view is that having free agency is part of being human. As cognitive beings we have the ability between alternatives and where politics is concerned, it is out of the realm of G-d's concern, it is strictly a human concern.

Comment_arrow

Bren

12:19 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012

Bryant, you can't have "God doesn't want us to have big government" and "abortion which is murder and as such we have a moral obligation to set up laws that prevent that." To enforce what "you" consider to be appropriate behavior in the bedroom would take a very large government indeed, so by doing that you counter what you claim is "God's" claim that we shouldn't have big government. Which one shall you have? The small government "God" wants or the big government "you" want to control people's behavior? You can't have both.

And I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't expect my government to provide "utopia." I do expect my tax dollars to be there for me should I ever need a helping hand, a road to drive on, or to protect us from terrorism--domestic, foreign, militaristic and/or economic.

Comment_arrow

Bryant Divelbiss

5:02 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012

Bren: I know of very few abortions in the bedroom. As for Birth Control that can be left up to the individual short of the morning after pill. I am not saying God has taken a position either way on Big Government. What I am saying is Christian beliefs do not mandate supporting government welfare. It is a perversion of the gospel to take the language on helping the poor and interpret that we must have the government build a massive welfare state even if the programs are destructive.

Comment_arrow

Randy1949

5:25 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012

@JRH -- I actually waded through the crowds of pamphlet waving protesters to see Last Temptation when it played at the Oriental. I can't recall what Willem Dafoe said, but I found it very moving when Jesus, as an old man, realizes the mistake he has made and returns to die on the cross. I don't remember David Bowie -- I've only seen the film twice.

@Bryant Divelbiss -- the 'morning after pill prevents ovulation, mostly, and prevents implantation as a last resort. It isn't an abortifacient.

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

5:43 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012

@Bryant Divelbiss...Your bible doesn't address specifically how the poor are to be taken care of. In my Tenach it clearly states how social inequity is to be dealt with, including feeding the poor, forgiving debt and returning land to people who have lost it. Neither versions prohibits or impels the government to be other than treat all with justice.

You have to recognize that your church's tenets have strongly influenced you on the role of government and the means for distributing social welfare. I am not questioning your beliefs, but it would be important to other readers that you acknowledge that your are only reflecting the basic tenets of your church Most members of your church I know do not strictly follow the church's dogma concerning birth control. Abortion and LGBT relations are followed much more closely. The Church has clearly outlined what is the right position and behavior. Ergo, if you are a member in good standing, you have given up the right of free agency.

Comment_arrow

Bren

6:59 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012

Bryant, you wrote ""God doesn't want us to have big government," so you did write that "God" has taken a position on Big Government.

"I know of very few abortions in the bedroom." Today's misconstruction award goes to Bryant, congratu-well done!

"As for Birth Control that can be left up to the individual short of the morning after pill. Your Big Government at work again?

I am aware that your use of the term "Christian beliefs" may differ from mine. I'll tell you that I support using my tax dollars to provide social safety nets because who knows but that I or someone I love may someday need it. Or anyone.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

7:37 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012

@Randy1949 -

Good for you - I personally would have loved to have seen 'Last Temptation' at the Oriental, as it's a great film and definitely one not to be missed.

Craig

4:13 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

Keith you have been more moderate lately, are you repenting some sins?

Reply

JVic

4:18 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

Hands down Jesus would vote democrat.

Reply

CowDung

4:20 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

2 Thessalonians 3:

"10 Even when we were with you we were giving you this command: “If anyone doesn’t want to work, they shouldn’t eat.” 11 We hear that some of you are living an undisciplined life. They aren’t working, but they are meddling in other people’s business. 12 By the Lord Jesus Christ, we command and encourage such people to work quietly and put their own food on the table."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bren

6:31 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

I have to point out that Paul of Tarsus (Saul) wrote the 1st and 2nd epistles to the Thessalonians. Paul never actually met Jesus (but claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to him in a vision). Paul is also attributed with remarks about women that have provided justification for some faith systems to disallow women from being pastors or serving on church committees.

JVic

4:31 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

If there were only two choices, Jesus would vote Democrat. The Bible says if you are rich, give everything you have to the poor so you can enter heaven. He when shows compassion to the poor, prostitutes and the sick (Obamacare). Republicans are also more willing to go to war and kill innocent women and children forgetting an eye for an eye. They are more like an eye for a life and a teeth for a region. As a former Christian we were also taught the Golden Rule. I was amazed to hear Evangelicals boo R Paul when he suggested that we treat others as we would like to be treated. How can a conservative be ok with that and then put so much emphasis on being against abortion. It is like we are here to protect the fetus but as soon as you are born buddy, you ate on you're own. Makes zero sense.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CowDung

4:38 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

The Republicans are more willing to go to war? Woodrow Wilson was president during WWI, and it seems to me that FDR was in power during most of WWII, with Truman being the one who gave the OK to drop the Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I think Truman was also in power during the Korean conflict as well. Kennedy and Johnson were the guys in charge when we got involved with Vietnam, weren't they?

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

10:25 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@CowDung -

I concur in the historical facts you presented. Perhaps JVic has been exposed to too much 'revisionist' history over on the Daily Kos.

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

8:28 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012

I'm guessing Jesus wouldn't be particularly pleased with anyone using his life and his teachings as a political cudgel, regardless of which side they're on.

Lyle Ruble

5:11 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@J.B. Schmidt...Religion and politics do not have a natural affinity. Both are institutions that organize and stabilize social structures, but have entirely different purposes. Using religion to support a political position is the ultimate call on authority. Our founders fully rejected the concept of a state religion and demanded the separation of church and state. Religion has been used as a justification for all kinds of inhuman behavior. However, to claim that Jesus of Nazareth was apolitical is just incorrect. The two things that Rome demanded of the subjected nations was to pay taxes and maintain order. He was executed for sedition. Also, if one follows the prophecies of the Tenach, the messiah was to be both a political leader and priest, neither of which the man from Nazareth fulfilled..

You approach the political issues from a perspective of Martin Luther and Jon Calvin while Jason Patzfahl approaches the issues from a perspective of Roman Catholicism. But, neither of these positions truly represent the values and beliefs of all of the electorate. There are many more perspectives than what these Christian positions represent.

Since the founding of the nation, religious institutions have had plenty of opportunity to step forward and alleviate social injustice, but have failed to do so. All of us who are capable of paying taxes can do the greatest good for the most people by using the only institution capable of getting the job done, the government.

Reply
Comment_arrow

SkinnyDude

5:28 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

The government is your idea pf getting the job done. The reality to any economy they have to produce to grow to create pretty much anything. The only thing government creates is debt. Clearly, Most who give to charity try to find one they can respect, One whose agenda is more narrow and not just in a General fund labled WHAT I THINK IS GOOD. People have always decided better than the Government as to what is important to them . Unfortunately, the governments idea of a CUT is generally an Increase due to the baseline they use to increase everyones budget whether they need it or not . It's not based in logic . If you think the Government is the entity that can save anything you are not living in a fantasy world. The more we turn things over to entrepreneurs the more efficient and less fraud riddled we become.

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

5:44 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@skinnyDUDE....For someone who claims authority in economics your statement is entirely wrong. A growth economy is what we are currently following, but that is not the only model. Government doesn't create debt unless demands are greater than revenue and it is our decision to underfund the demand.

Other than the government, what institution exists that can handle the magnitude posed by social injustice and the needs of the poor. No one should profit from others misfortune. Turning over the safety net to entrepreneurs is incorrect on a number of levels and profiting from others' misfortune is just plain immoral.

Comment_arrow

SkinnyDude

6:09 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@lyle
Obama has created 1//3 of the nations deficit in 3 years. You can talk Liberal programs until your blue in the face. If you d everything with a IOU the country collapses. Than all the programs and social justice are meaningless. Look at the greek model . We are sadly not that far off. The entire economy is now less than the deficit . GDP. Growth is slowing not increasing? The obama model is laughable .Go back to your Global warming club and quit wasting my time with nonsense.

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

6:40 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@skinnyDUDE...Your obsession with national debt is something that is your problem not the actual economy. Based on your statements that under Obama has increased the debt, must be taken in context. The economy hasn't taken such a retraction since the Great Depression. Obama walked into this mess. Anyone who walked into similar conditions would have grown the debt, especially since congress refuses to fund. You're the one who's wasting your own time.

Comment_arrow

SkinnyDude

7:21 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@ Lyle
Obama is a failure by any standard . But the economic cliff is approaching. It's not a illogical guess like global warming which you embrace. It is the reality. You offer excuses and I offer the reality of the situation . President Obama inherited a housing bubble created largely by government regulation of loan practices . Written by DEMS and supported by to many repubs. The bubble burst! This is the boat we are in .So we have to deal with it . Obama state of the union speech barely touched on the Nation's biggest problem .If it isnt addressed by AMERICANs it will not be addressed. We are not tiny greece, which is paralyzing Europe . If we go down we set the entire world on fire. No one can bail us out . Social remedies we cant pay for are stupid , cause in the end the pain will truly create a depression which will make what Obama failures look mild indeed. The house of cards truly falls when no one buys the debt cause they know we are going down . Just as the banks bundled up mortgages until they had no buyers. The government is playing the same shell game . In the end , we all will be losers. Obama's Trickle down Poverty has failed . And judging by the electorial map and polls by state.....this 4 year nightmare will soon be over.

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

8:07 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@skinnyDUDE...I'm sorry, but your statements are not factually based. Greece is not the problem in Europe, it's only symptomatic of a problem with the Euro Zone and fundamental differences between Germany's aversion to inflation and France's insistence on national sovereignty.

As far as our own economy we have walked to the edge and now we are backing away. The economy is growing and hiring is increasing. Obama is not such a failure as you suggest.

Comment_arrow

SkinnyDude

9:09 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@LYLE
Ultimatlely the voters will decide . The polls I have looked at show a tough road to hoe for our failed president. But if Obama wins again I know we all lose . This is not a hoax like global warming. Its the reality of dire fiscal picture . We might need JESUS to fill the baskets at that point !

THE END!

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

10:22 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@Lyle -

So, what your saying is that keynesian economic policy is preferable to austrian economic policy, despite the fact that following austrian economic policy would have prevented the economic meltdown all together?

I strongly disagree that any President would have raised deficit spending to fix the national economic problems that we faced in 2008, and since then. After all, raising taxes and spending like a drunken sailor didn't help Hoover very much, did it?

Comment_arrow

SkinnyDude

10:50 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@ Hoffa
Frankly , I couldnt have foreseen anyone spending this much money period. The spending wasnt very focused. Crabs running on treadmills, green energy no one wants and union payoffs. They you say no to the PIPELINE which is exactly the type of private investment and jobs we need. Even the unions were for it . The economics and logic of this President make little sense and have the no results and a mountain of deficit to show for it . It's kind of depressing when this President brags about a 8.3 % unemployment number that figures in 1.2 million people quit the workforce in ONE MONTH . By any standard this President is a failure at best!

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

11:43 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@skinnyDUDE -

I wholly concur with you about Obama's reckless and massive deficit spending, as that's the point I was making to Lyle. But I also don't think that pure 'supply side' economics is the answer either, which is why I, as does Dr. Ron Paul, advocate for an austrian economic policy. Combine that with fair trade deals with the cheater nations, and you fix most of our economic problems in a relatively short period of time.

GearHead

5:17 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

I seem to remember Jesus wasn't so hot about taxes, but loved tax collectors who repented their evil ways, like Matthew.

Reply

JVic

5:39 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

@Cowdong, the new generation of Republicans.

Reply

Heather 2

6:37 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

I whe as not going to comment since it seemed there were only men commenting. Then I scrolled up and noted that the editor shared my named. Actually. I voted for Jesus in 2008. I got Obama/. All I can say is united we stand. Any rocket scientist can figure out the phenominom that the Holy Spirit lives in our hearts, and our body is a temple. Jesus is a genius and he will win this election also. God bless America.

Reply

James R Hoffa

10:14 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

Everything I need to know in life, I learned from Star Trek!

Captain Kirk (William Shatner): "Cosmic Thoughts, Gentlemen?"

'Bones' McCoy (DeForest Kelley): "We were just debating - is god really out there?"

Captain Kirk (William Shatner): "Maybe he's not out there, Bones. Maybe he's right here. In the human heart."

Star Trek V: The Final Frontier (1989)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

11:25 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

My favorite line from that movie: "If you're God, why do you need a star ship?"

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

11:52 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkT1-N0VqUc

IMHO, ST V: TFF was severely underrated by both critics and Trek fans alike, as the plot is far more consistent with Roddenberry's vision than most of the 'Next Generation' based films.

I actually had the opportunity to meet and have a conversation with Shatner when he was in Milwaukee. He really is a great guy!

Justa Comment

8:02 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012

I noticed you said you disapproved of Clinton (Democrat) but not a word about Tricky Dick (Republican.)

Reply

SkinnyDude

2:51 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012

@ Hoffa
I dont think it can be done in short order as politicians are still using baseline budgeting to increase spending every year. If the budget is baselined to go up 8 % across the board a year and these politiicians reduce the increase to 6% they call it a CUT . When its actually a 6 % increase. Until politicians actually make Real cuts it will be hard to turn the tide. Revamp the tax code completely . Start over no loop holes and no refunds for non taxpayers . Trade enforcement everyone wants and penalties for cheaters that have a BITE to them . Penalties for fraud that have a bite to them .
Ron paul certainly has some favorable economic views. Hopefully someone will adopt some of them. As his foriegn policy and drug legalization views make him unelectable by the majority.

Reply

Leave a comment