patching...
Update: For the latest local news, follow us on Facebook and Twitter
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

Endorsement of Ed Fallone for Wisconsin Supreme Court

MADISON – Today, United Wisconsin announced its official endorsement of Ed Fallone for Wisconsin Supreme Court. Fallone is challenging conservative Justice Patience Roggensack and, along with one other challenger, faces a primary election on February 19.

“Ed Fallone is the clear choice for Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice,” said United Wisconsin Executive Director Lisa Subeck. “Fallone has the experience and integrity necessary to restore civility, balance, and impartiality to Wisconsin’s Supreme Court.”

Fallone has decades of experience in the legal field, with expertise in constitutional, criminal, and corporate law, and a long history of service to the community. His qualifications include:

  • Associate professor of law at Marquette University
  • Over 25 year as a practicing attorney in both Federal and State courts.
  • J.D., magna cum laude, Boston University School of Law.
  • Led non-profits organizations working to increase access to the justice system for immigrants and working families.
  • Recipient of the President’s Award, Community Shares of Greater Milwaukee 2010.

Conservative incumbent, Patience Roggensack, has contributed to the dysfunction and high level of partisanship on the current court. She was a key supporter of closing certain Supreme Court proceedings, effectively keeping the court’s decision making process out of the view of the public. Along with her conservative colleagues on the court, Roggensack chose to recuse herself from hearing a case regarding fellow conservative, Justice David Prosser, preventing the hearing from moving forward. Her recusal blocked any possible disciplinary action in the case in which Prosser was accused of choking a fellow Justice.

“Wisconsinites deserve a high-functioning and non-partisan Supreme Court to protect our system of checks and balances,” Subeck added. “Fallone will help restore civility and trust in our state’s highest court. United Wisconsin is proud to endorse Ed Fallone for Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice.”

                                                       # # #

United Wisconsin is an independent, grassroots organization of citizens restoring the Wisconsin tradition of democracy in action. For more information, visit our website at www.unitedwisconsin.com.

CowDung

10:13 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

My comment has been 'pending approval' for 45 minutes or so. Let me try this again:

Apparently United Wisconsin didn't like the way the comment section was going the first time this was posted, so they decided to try again.

http://foxpoint.patch.com/blog_posts/endorsement-of-ed-fallone-for-wisconsin-supreme-court

Reply
Comment_arrow

CowDung

11:05 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

"Today, United Wisconsin announced its official endorsement of Ed Fallone for Wisconsin Supreme Court."

Shouldn't they have at least changed "Today" to "On February 6"?

Comment_arrow

Greg

10:47 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Today is not February 6th.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

9:09 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Exactly. February 6 was the day that they endorsed Fallone. This article was posted on both the 6th and the 8th.

morninmist

11:22 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Vote for positive change in WI

http://democurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2013/02/justice-roggensack-insists-activism.html?spref=tw

..There’s no question the Wisconsin Supreme Court is dysfunctional, with a roguish band of activist conservative justices that have bent over backwards to quickly advance the legislatures political agenda. Its attempted power grab to change the way the chief justice is chosen, along with threats and physical altercations that have embarrassed the state nationally, should no longer be tolerated.

And that’s why candidate Ed Fallone let Justice Roggensack have it:

jsonline: Two challengers to incumbent Justice Patience Roggensack let her and the audience know that they think the high court needs reform that only a change of personnel can bring.

Ed Fallone, a Marquette University law professor, criticized Roggensack for recusing herself from hearing an ethics complaint against Justice David Prosser over his 2011 physical altercation with Justice Ann Bradley and for supporting closure of certain administrative conferences that had long been held in public.

He cast the court as "completely dysfunctional," hamstrung by incivility that even extends to "personal sniping in (published) opinions."
Remember the rogue’s gallery of extremist Republican supporters that turned out to celebrate David Prosser’s reelection win? Nothing screamed activist justice after all the Prosser thank you's? But in the fantasy world of conservatism, ..

Reply
Comment_arrow

CowDung

11:31 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

"Ed Fallone, a Marquette University law professor, criticized Roggensack for recusing herself from hearing an ethics complaint against Justice David Prosser over his 2011 physical altercation with Justice Ann Bradley..."

If Fallone isn't knowledgeable enough to know that one cannot be both a material witness and a judge on a case, then I don't think he belongs on the court.

Roggensack, by law, had to recuse herself as she was present during the Bradley-Prosser incident.

Comment_arrow

Bren

1:19 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

I believe members of the state supreme court have also lamented the dysfunction and that there had been a recommendation to bring in some type of mediator. As a taxpayer and grown-up, considering how many good, well-qualified people have lost their jobs since 2009, paying people to argue like children on a playground is ridiculous.

Comment_arrow

The Anti-Alinsky

9:35 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

As usual morninmist is quick to point the dysfunction at the Conservatives on the court, while giving the Liberals a pass, notably Abrahamson and Bradley.

Comment_arrow

red

2:10 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Abrahamson is the roaring irritation on the Court. Her reign has been marked by resignations and conflict. Republicans are not the extremists, it is the Blue Fist (fascist symbol) that are at that polarizing leve.

Frederic

11:53 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

"If Fallone isn't knowledgeable enough to know that one cannot be both a material witness and a judge on a case, then I don't think he belongs on the court.

Roggensack, by law, had to recuse herself as she was present during the Bradley-Prosser incident."

This is the beauty of Internet commenting. One should never - ever - pause to consider the possibility that one might not have a fully considered opinion or wonder whether - given that someone speaking from a position of apparent authority has said something contrary to one's own prior understanding - one might have missed something. No, that would not be appropriate at all. One's own half-thought-through view of things must be right, because it is one's own. So one must comment away.

What I am suggesting, CowDung, is that perhaps this is a unique situation that does not fall neatly within the simple rule as you understand it (rules sometimes have exceptions, doncha know). You might start your inquiry (note that I said "start" and not "end") with something called the "rule of necessity" and see whether that helps. You might well reach the conclusion that Roggensack's view is correct. But there are substantial arguments on both sides. To act as if Fallone is stupid or evil for holding the contrary position is, at a minimum, jump the gun.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CowDung

11:57 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

It's clear that Fallone is playing politics for the low information voter. It's likely he'd be criticizing her for not recusing herself if she stayed on the case and sided with Prosser.

Comment_arrow

Bren

2:54 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

I think there's some confusion about the Bradley/Prosser incident. Dane County Sheriff's Department and the Wisconsin Judicial Commission (WJC) brought the issue to the DA (as I understand it). A special prosecutor was appointed who deemed there wasn't enough evidence to proceed. The WJC then lodged an ethics complaint against Prosser asking for a disciplinary action. It is this, not the initial investigation, from which certain legislators recused. My interpretation of "disciplinary action" as appropriate in this case would be reprimand.
Bradley has been cited by Prosser as being contentious (my word) over time but Prosser is documented for outbursts, including threatening to "destroy" Shirley Abrahamson in 2010. I continue to maintain that reprimanding Prosser's behavior and recommending (perhaps) anger management therapy, as a body, would have sent him a message and an opportunity for behavioral and spiritual improvement. Why colleagues would recuse this step is not clearly understood by me, and why I wrote in an earlier post that I would want some discussion from Roggensack about her decision.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

3:03 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

At the time, Roggensack stated her reasoning for her recusal--it was unlawful for her to be both a material witness and a judge. Failing to recuse herself in this matter may even have been grounds for ethics charges to be brought up against her.

Comment_arrow

Luke

3:36 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

3 of the 4 witnesses recused themselves. The remaining one was prepared to do so, but it was not necessary.

WaitingForTheSpark

12:22 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

United Wisconsin was a major player in the Recall Walker effort. Thus a radical Progressive like Ed Fallone would be a very, very, very bad choice to sit on the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Reply

Bob McBride

12:25 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

They think Ed's so nice they endorsed him twice?

I could have sworn this was posted before and we had discussed, among other things, Lyle's penchant for voting for balance versus along party lines.

Reply

morninmist

12:36 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

She can not even report her contributions!

February 1, 2013

The Case of the Missing Contributions: Roggensack Fails to Report Big Money From Out-of-State Private School Voucher Backers in Latest Campaign Finance Report

http://www.onewisconsinnow.org/press/httpwwwonewisconsinnoworgfilesroggensack20doesnt20report20voucher20cashpdf.html

Madison -- A review of campaign finance reports by One Wisconsin Now has uncovered that State Supreme Court candidate Patience Roggensack failed to disclose $20,550 in campaign contributions bundled by backers of the private school voucher program on her latest campaign finance report. While Roggensack’s campaign failed to report the contribution, a separate report filed by the group Fund for Parent Choice shows they made a contribution of $20,550 to Roggensack on December 27, 2012, several days before the close of the reporting period.

One Wisconsin Now Executive Director Scot Ross commented, “While the right-wing boasts that Patience Roggensack will, as a member of the court, vote to protect the program that gives parents a government voucher to send their child to private schools, her campaign fails to disclose tens of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions that she’s received in return from the out-of-state billionaire ideologues that back the voucher program experiment.”

...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Greg

1:47 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Swing and a miss. The lefties are pathetic!

"Scholz said the Roggensack campaign was compliant with campaign finance laws, which require contributions to be deposited within five days. The check went out Dec. 27 and, as their office was closed Dec. 31 and Jan. 1, the Roggensack campaign deposited it Jan. 2."

The check will be on the next fundraising report due Feb. 11.

“I think what should be worrisome [is] an associate professor who’s teaching law, and he’s not getting it right,” Scholz said. “That’s something to worry about.”

Comment_arrow

red

2:14 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Hey did you see how successful vouchers are?
tudents in the Washington, D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program posted graduation rates that were 18 percent above their public school peers. Additionally, students gained 3.1 months of additional learning in reading.
Students who participated in the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program for four years demonstrated significantly higher learning gains in math (11 percentage points) and reading (six percentage points) than their peers in conventional public schools. In addition, they graduated at a rate that was 18 percent higher than students in conventional public schools.
Students who participated in the Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program demonstrated a seven percentage point increase in reading scores and a 15 percentage point increase in math scores over their peers in conventional public schools.
Low-income students participating in a Florida corporate voucher program are keeping pace with-and in many cases outpacing-all students nationwide (not just low-income children), despite the fact that the scholarships are a third of the c

Jay Sykes

12:43 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

In the age of the InterWebs a 'double posting campaign' has the equivalent feel of an 'Airborne Leaflet Drop'.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jay Sykes

12:45 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Or, make that #Airborne.leaflet.drop (but, read it as PROPAGANDA)

morninmist

12:57 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Another grand tweet from United WIsconsin!

United Wisconsin @UnitedWisconsin
Scott Walker gets smackdown from Minnesota governor after job pitch: bit.ly/WTW2If #wiunion #wipolitics

...
In a political smackdown, however, Dayton took a shot at Walker during his State of the State address on Wednesday, noting that Minnesota was 12th in the nation in job creation last year while Wisconsin “which, by the way, is ‘open for business,’ helped bring up the rear at 42nd.”

Dayton kept up the drubbing: "And, help spread the word across the St. Croix, their unemployment rate last month was 20 percent higher than ours, while our per-capita income was 12 percent higher than theirs."

Also left out of the discussion is that Minnesota has seen its wages and incomes increase over the past decades while Wisconsin has been going in the opposite direction.

Read more: http://host.madison.com/news/local/writers/mike_ivey/scott-walker-gets-smackdown-from-minnesota-governor-after-job-pitch/article_335c83ba-7178-11e2-b297-001a4bcf887a.html#ixzz2KKrgYWuF

Reply

morninmist

1:11 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Wealthy voucher supporters spend big bucks in Supreme Court race

Read more: http://host.madison.com/news/local/writers/jack_craver/wealthy-voucher-supporters-spend-big-bucks-in-supreme-court-race/article_46d1715a-7176-11e2-80bd-0019bb2963f4.html#ixzz2KKv2St5a

......The Wisconsin Education Association Council, for instance, recently announced its endorsement of Fallone, a Marquette University Law School professor.

“He understands educators and both of his children attended public school,” said executive director Mary Bell in a statement. “He believes the law is about logic and the court should act as an independent check when the political branches of government overreach and threaten the individual rights granted in our Constitution.”

Significantly, unions and other progressive groups are shunning the other liberal-leaning candidate in the race, Megna, whom they see as unelectable, due to his often-outrageous campaign antics and his unapologetically partisan campaign.

Read more: http://host.madison.com/news/local/writers/jack_craver/wealthy-voucher-supporters-spend-big-bucks-in-supreme-court-race/article_46d1715a-7176-11e2-80bd-0019bb2963f4.html#ixzz2KKufksYi...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Greg

1:23 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

If a Republican had sent 3 of his/her kids to public school, would he/she get Merry Bell's endorsement for Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice? Is this pay to play?

Comment_arrow

morninmist

1:46 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

No it is not but you sure make yourself look foolish with your question.

...........

Greg
1:23 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

If a Republican had sent 3 of his/her kids to public school, would he/she get Merry Bell's endorsement for Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice? Is this pay to play?
...

Comment_arrow

Greg

1:55 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

I blame my public school education. My public school teachers always told me that I wouldn't look foolish for asking a question.

Steve ®

1:24 am on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Why is this propaganda being allowed to be posted twice? L I be r a l m e d I a.

Reply

Bob McBride

7:46 am on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Lately it seems like anything that gets more than a certain number of comments qualifies for rehashing, but usually it's not just a reposting of exactly the same article/opinion piece. I'd be interested in hearing why an identical endorsement was posted twice, two days apart, and why both remain in place. I don't personally find it particularly bothersome - just odd.

Reply

GearHead

8:17 am on Saturday, February 9, 2013

If I form a non-profit with a high-minded name, start faxing & emailing press releases, do I get to publish such propaganda too? Who'd a thunk it?

Reply

morninmist

1:17 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Some folks have had enough of the TeaGOP in Wisconsin!

http://cognidissidence.blogspot.com/2013/02/escape-from-fitzwalkerstan.html

Saturday, February 9, 2013

Escape From Fitzwalkerstan!
Did you ever wonder how the unemployment percentage continued to drop even as we kept having more people losing their jobs?

Simple.

Between the Republicans, led by Scott Walker, trying to ruin the state and Chris Abele trying to turn Milwaukee County into a plutocratic utopia, people have been simply packing up and leaving the state in droves.

Will the last one out please turn off the lights?

Reply
Comment_arrow

red

2:22 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

------Did you ever wonder how the FEDERAL unemployment percentage continued to drop even as we kept having more people losing their jobs?

Wisconsin statistics follow Obama's percentages though Walker is doing better.

Comment_arrow

Tansandy

6:39 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Yes, we all have had enough! That's why we elected Walker, not once but twice. And the last time by a greater margin. And the voters said who should control our start. And big surprise, we made the huge deficit that Diamond Jim Doyle and his loyal Democrat minion left us. Forward Wisconsin!!!! The only thing left to do is to replace the draft dodger Lehman with someone who won't run and hide when things get difficult.

morninmist

1:35 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Good for Russ.

rootriversiren Root River Siren: Feingold Endorses Fallone rootriversiren.blogspot.com/2013/02/feingo… #wiunion

Friday, February 8, 2013
Feingold Endorses Fallone

Reply

Mr Lundt

1:54 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

I was wondering what was going to wake Rusty up from his nap.

We know it was not going to be his concerns over drone killings...because agenda tops character.

Reply

Keith Best

2:24 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Fallone is being bankrolled by "SPECIAL INTERESTS".

Progressives PAC is supplying boatloads of money to the Fallone campaign.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Keith Best

2:27 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

P.S. They're way worse than the Koch Bros.

Avenging Angel

3:34 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

The leftist can't win at the ballot box, so they are attempting to legislate from the bench. I predict this will turn out much like Prosser's election, i.e. a 53-47 victory for Roggensack.

Reply
Comment_arrow

FreeThought Troy

12:46 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

TeaPublicans can’t win an election without gerrymandering voting districts i.e. rigging the ballot boxes or suppressing the vote.

jbw

4:29 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

But I thought that judges were removed from partisan politics! Their total impartiality and service to justice must be what causes one political party or the other to throw all of its weight and money behind them.

This post is missing its most critical element, though, the statement that "this election is a referendum on the policies of Scott Walker". Why was that statement used so frequenty and prominently by liberals regarding all the previous ballots that ended in a conservative victory, but it does not appear here? Has it become a "kiss of death" to utter on campaign?

Reply

Born Free

1:15 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Voting fraud 'DISENFRANCHISES'

95% of the people belching racism CHOOSE to be in same color/race relationships (marriage, shacking, friend(s)) yet claim they're not bigot's or racist. Go figure!

Man on man sex, boy on boy sex and man on boy sex is all gay sex.

Gun's don't murder 3,000 preborn preschooler's DAILY in the U.S.,...progressive Democrat policies do.

Unions and liberal lame stream media are independantly the 2 most wealthiest and powerful lobbying groups...not the NRA.

Reply
Comment_arrow

FreeThought Troy

12:51 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Man on man sex is gay sex
Man on boy sex is pedophilia
Don’t know the terminology of boy on boy sex as internet Google search leads to some very scary websites I don’t want any part of

Purposefully lying about definitions of gay sex is plain wrong.
You are right. The NRA is no longer the political power house they once were. We should all stop being afraid of them and their out of touch policy positions…

Even though I don’t know what the NRA has to do with the WI Supreme Court. Did they endorse someone?

morninmist

11:40 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Good for Ed.

PolitiScoop ‏@PolitiScoop

Fallone Campaign continues to build momentum heading into primary http://www.politiscoop.com/campaign-trail/item/1437-fallone-campaign-continues-to-build-momentum-heading-into-primary.html … #wiunion

Milwaukee, Wisconsin – Ed Fallone announced today that Congresswomen Gwen Moore, former U.S. Senator Russ Feingold, and former U.S. Congressman Dave Obey have endorsed his campaign for Wisconsin Supreme Court.

“It’s an honor to have the support of three leaders who have spent their careers fighting for justice, access, and fairness in government,” said Fallone. “As a Supreme Court Justice I will always stand up to the special interests and ensure that all Wisconsinites have equal access to our justice system."

The Fallone campaign will announce additional endorsements in the coming days.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Greg

2:36 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Elvis,
Segway Boy and
Mr. Ed

These are slightly better than the last three.

morninmist

11:42 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Lets get the good word out for Ed.

Melissa Austin ‏@wearewithefilm

#wearewi coming to communities all over #WI in March. First stop @cops4labor town. #1u #p2 #wiunion http://fb.me/21Wjt59cP
Retweeted by America United

Reply

mr.chris a engel

10:10 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

if you do the right thing you dont have to compromise. why is it so difficult ! Fallone has enough of his playmates in the court allready .lets promote a little alittle balance with different veiws.remember the SCALES that represent balance? KEEP THE COURTS IN BALANCE ! VOTE ROGGENSACK!

Reply

mr.chris a engel

8:41 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

hey all you authours where do yuos come up with all these fairytale names?What are yous hiding from Why dontyou all want anyone to know who you REALLY R?

Reply

GearHead

5:24 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Why is it that liberal causes can never find a candidate with any experiance? Fallone has never been a judge at anything, so exactly what qualifies him to sit on the high bench? You know, records mean something.

Reply

morninmist

12:44 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Time for RAG... to get a new job! Vote for Fallone.

On Tuesday, hold Pat Roggensack to account host.madison.com/news/opinion/c… #wiunion #wipolitics
Tuesday’s primary begins an election process in which Roggensack will be held to account. She’s spending a lot of money from out-of-state donors — especially wealthy critics of public education who hope the court will back so-called “school choice” proposals — in order to win re-election. Her opponents, Marquette University professor Ed Fallone and consumer lawyer Vince Megna, while less well funded, are mounting spirited campaigns.

Megna says of the court: “Nothing will change if Justice Roggensack is re-elected.”

Fallone makes a somewhat different case, arguing that Roggensack is part of a deeper dysfunction — that the real problem is an abandonment of the court’s historic commitment to independent and nonpartisan judicial review. The Capital Times has endorsed Fallone because he has focused on healing the court by renewing its commitment to respect the Constitution and the rule of law and avoiding the sort of blatant judicial activism that was on display when Roggensack and her allies rejected open meetings rules in order to advance Gov. Walker’s agenda. Fallone is also an enthusiastic proponent of getting big money out of judicial elections, with campaign finance reforms such as the Impartial Justice Act.....

..

Reply
Comment_arrow

Greg

1:18 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

RAG?

Fallone is a puppet for the big union special interests.

Comment_arrow

morninmist

1:28 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Her you go Greg

Have a good laugh. It is good for you!

@Progress2day Pro-mining teabagger advocate has chat with a tree jsonline.com/blogs/news/188… #wiunion #wipolitics

Comment_arrow

Carbon Bigfuut

9:18 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

MM, would you like to try that again in english...or sober?

Comment_arrow

Keith Schmitz

7:23 pm on Saturday, March 30, 2013

Greg, we all know what hand is up your back.

mr.chris a engel

7:50 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

when Roggensach win reelection just think what the Phamacutical stocks are going to do.WEEEEEEEEEEE

Reply

a quiet conservative

1:43 pm on Thursday, April 4, 2013

So when is the next BBQ...Didn't United Wisconsin do one on the Northside of Milwaukee?

Reply

Leave a comment