Democratic Recall Candidates Must Be United, Former Congressman Says
With Kathleen Falk going on the offensive against leading Democratic gubernatorial candidate Tom Barrett, Dave Obey calls for a cease-fire.
With media reports indicating Kathleen Falk going on the offensive against Tom Barrett, a leading Wisconsin Democrat called for his party to show a united front against Gov. Scott Walker.
Former U.S. Rep. Dave Obey, speaking in a conference call with reporters Wednesday morning, called Walker "belligerently confrontational" and said the Democratic candidates in this spring's recall election need to be concentrating their fire on him, not each other.
Obey spoke in response to a Politico report Tuesday that said the Falk campaign planned to ratchet up the rhetoric against Barrett in the next two weeks in hopes of gaining in the polls. The report said a Falk staffer criticized Barrett for hesitating to sign a recall petition, while a Journal Sentinel story quoted Falk as challenging Barrett's views on the governor's collective bargaining legislation.
Obey, who has endorsed Barrett, said the notion that one of the four Democratic candidates is not sufficiently opposed to Walker is "grasping at straws."
"No one candidate is more opposed to Walker than any of the others," Obey said.
Obey said the candidates must keep their "eyes on the prize" and earn the trust of voters by treating each other in a fair-minded way.
He said a divided party would be akin to a "suicide pact."
"The chances of unseating the governor are not so outrageously good that we can waste time attacking each other," Obey said. "Stretching facts to score points ... needlessly divides us."
In a statement through campaign spokesman Scot Ross, Falk said she has been attacked for her labor support and determination to stand up for working men and women.
"I'm talking to voters about important differences between Tom and myself," Falk said. "I've been part of this movement from the start. We'll beat Walker with the movement that started a year ago, a strong grassroots campaign with labor, women, environmentalists and community organizers.
"The real suicide is if elected officials ignore the grassroots, the labor unions, women and the environmentalists who are supporting my campaign because of my commitment to undoing Walker's harms."
The Democratic primary is May 8, while the general election is June 5.
Tommy
12:55 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Ha ha! "I hate him more- no I hate him more." It's the only platform they have to run on.....what a joke.
Alfred
1:04 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Falking right it is a joke. Watching these democrats is like watching drunken monkeys, what a circus of freaks!
Bren
2:11 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Tammy, I'm not sure how you arrived at that interpretation based on the article. Did you read it?
Greg
1:24 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Ah, the anyone but Walker tactic. I guess that's a lot easier than having an actual platform. I really like the Obey way, "Stretching facts to score points ... needlessly divides us." So let's stand together and only lie about Walker, then we can lose as a group.
Bren
2:11 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Greg, check the headline of today's MJS. Are you suggesting that that conservative paper is now in cahoots with the Democratic Party? Are you challenging the job report? Let's see your data that shows that Wisconsin is near or at the top of the scoreboard in job growth nationally, or that Walker's "reforms" are not being mirrored in multiple states by other ALEC governors. How is Walker's budget is "working" when it hasn't even fully taken effect yet. I'd also like to know how much of the public employee salary cuts have been handed over to corporations (I understand that Georgia Pacific has received quite a bit but haven't been able to nail down the amount--perhaps you have this)?
Greg, it's so easy to make statements like "let's stand together and only lie about Walker." But please back it up with some facts about what is being "lied" about and why they are "lies." Thanks,
Greg
2:47 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
I was commenting on the article.
I suggested nothing about any paper. I challenged no report. I presented no job data. Etc..
As for easy statements, I just quoted Obey's "Stretching facts to score points", I see this as a convoluted way of saying "lying".
What is their platform? Is it that they don't know how much Georgia Pacific got? Or is it a more mindless rant, such as ALEC, ALEC, ALEC....
If you really need a lie it probably would include something about "public employee salary cuts". Where do you get that from?
Bren
4:05 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
So Greg, nothing to back up your "only lie about Walker" statement? Because that's from you, not Obey.
Greg
4:18 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Well let's see, Obey basically said they do not want to lie about each other so I inturn read it as they want to strech the facts only about Walker.
Bren, anything on your public employee salary cuts? That's from you.
Adam Wienieski
9:24 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Poor confused Bren, personal and corporate income is not a natural resource that belongs to everyone like air, water and sunshine. Rich people and successful companies pay all the taxes. When an individual or company gets to keep more of their own money it's not a tax cut, its stealing less from the people who earned it. The tax cuts Walker has initiated amount to 3 percent of the state's deficit.
So how would Barrett (D-WEAC) and Falk (D-AFSCME) have balanced the budget and eliminated the $3.6 billion deficit Scott Walker inherited from his predecessor? Both are on record saying they wouldn't ask public union employee's to sacrifice a thing so where would the savings come from?
Barack Obama has finally laid to rest the silly notion that democrats are good for the economy so how do Falk (D-AFSCME) and Barrett (D-WEAC) plan on controlling education and medicare costs without massive tax increases? Let's hear the intelligent, workable plan that Scooter missed, I'll make the popcorn.
btw, ALEC stands for free markets, limited government and individual liberty.
GearHead
1:35 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Dave Obey is one of the primary authors of the ill-conceived "stimulus-porkulous package" that stimulated nothing, and ended up being a slush fund for growing government. Another losing program from the Democrats. And I'm not stretching any facts saying that. So now we should listen to him?
Bren
2:03 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Gear, to what are you referring? Remember that bail-outs began with George W. Bush.
Steve ®
2:47 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
@Bren (D-WEAC)
Bailouts ≠ stimulus
Greg
3:01 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
I don't remember George W. Bush pushing a stimulus package, I think that came with hope and change.
Bren
4:04 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
George Bush basically handed out cash. Metrics came with Hope and Change. But it had to be done. If memory serves, Ronald Reagan and Amtrak was the inspiration. Amtrak is still alive and running today. So is Wall Street, GM, and Chrysler. That's a lot of jobs saved under extraordinary and adverse circumstances. We're not now trying to frame economic recovery as profligate Democratic spending, are we?
Steve, I'm not a Democrat and have absolutely nothing to do with WEAC.
Steve ®
4:35 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Bren (D-WEAC)
keep telling yourself that. Maybe one day it will click and come true.
David Tatarowicz
2:32 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
@Gearhead --- Republicans and Democrats BOTH supported the stimulus packages, they actually started under Bush and He Did the Right Thing !!! Thank God Obama followed Bush's lead --- we had the Great Recession and only with the actions of DC did we not have another Great Depression --- like back in 1929 when the government sat on its hands in a Laissez Faire attitude.
Bren
2:02 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
I agree with Dave Obey. With the problems our state faces because of the recession and Scott Walker's ideological (and no doubt erroneous) budgeting, the only way to get back on track is to focus. Tom Barrett would make an excellent governor, a lot of people voted for Scott Walker because he promised 250,000 new jobs and now that we know that's not going to happen Tom Barrett is the obvious choice.
I have nothing against Kathleen Falk or any of the other candidates, any of them would do a better job than Scott Walker because unlike him, they care about the great state of Wisconsin.
Barrett needs to assemble a team now to go through the Walker budget, find the "math" errors, cut out the crony raises, etc., remove the ideological foolishness, and get ready to hit the ground running as soon as possible. Walker's next budget "bomb" drops in July, which promises to have a disastrous effect on the 2012-13 school year. With some common sense, professional accounting review, perhaps some of the "bomb" effects could be mitigated (for example, putting the $750,000 in crony raises/bonuses back into K-12 education?).
Steve ®
2:55 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Metro Milwaukee lost 4,400 jobs in March, state reports
Metro Milwaukee accounted for most of the job losses in the state last month
December 2011 - 1500
November 2011 -4,700
October 2011 -2,500
►get ready to hit the ground running as soon as possible.◄ About as descriptive as Obama ran is campaign.
Greg
2:58 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Barrett does not even make a good mayor, why would he be a good governor?
"Walker's next budget "bomb" drops in July, which promises to have a disastrous effect on the 2012-13 school year" WOW Bren, you sound just like Mary Bell with her moronic end of the world claims. She was dead wrong as are you. The school districts that used the reforms are all better off than before. WEA Trust got greedy and Walker closed the check book. I trust Walkers math more than I trust the unions or your math.
Alfred
3:06 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Barrett is the failing mayor of a failing city.
Bren
6:23 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Steve, Milwaukee is Wisconsin's largest city, doesn't it make sense that job losses concentrate in that urban area? And while the economy is recovering, we can expect aftershocks for some time to come (why it was ridiculous for Walker to claim he could create 250,000 new jobs in his first term).
Greg, that's not true. I'd rather have competent financial managers review the Walker budget before the July "bomb" drops, but if that doesn't happen we'll see what happens.
I hope enough people realize the Walker talking points aren't adding up and choose a better direction in June. Some, who care only about winning and not about what's right, will continue to support the radical ALEC agenda and Scott Walker.
Steve ®
10:39 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Nope. I could argue that it is the largest city and job growth should be the highest. Job losses are concentrated on the plight that is Milwaukee. Wonder why. Barrett couldn't even get Kohl's into the city. Why are all of the job losses only in one city? Population, nope try again.
Steve ®
2:40 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Every time I see that pic of Falk I think of this
http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lghtksjd5B1qzg00ho1_400.jpg
Greg
3:03 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
I think of an old baseball mit.
Alfred
3:05 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Whichever dentist worked on Falks overbite and chiclet teeth really falked up, they look fake.
Bob McBride
3:10 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
I like the way her gloved hand was shopped so it doesn't look like she was flipping off Tom Barrett.
Tom Barrett
3:46 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
BAD BAD BAD!!!!!
http://www.newstalk1130.com/pages/common_sense_central.html?article=10075572
Tom Barrett
4:33 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
10 worst schools in the state.
http://www.schooldigger.com/go/WI/schoolrank.aspx?pagetype=bottom10&level=3
Tom Barrett
4:34 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Bad?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEogS0UOxHI
Luke
7:59 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Q: What's the difference between Barrett and Falk?
A: Falk has balls.
morninmist
5:23 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
John Nichols @NicholsUprising
Kathleen Falk, #wirecall candidate, announces she has raised $1M. New theme: "Who better than a woman to end Scott Walker's war on women?"