patching...
Update: For the latest local news, follow us on Facebook and Twitter
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Backlash Against Banks a Boon for Local Credit Unions

An estimated 14,700 Wisconsinites joined credit unions in October, siting frustration with bank fees and for-profit corporate structures.

 

When the Occupy Milwaukee protest gathered outside his bank on Oct. 15, Prescott Sobol said he knew it was time for him to switch to a credit union.

"It was embarrassing to be part of the Occupy protests, when they were outside Chase Bank," said Sobol, who moved his account to the UW Credit Union on Friday. "I feel like I'm behind the curve on this."

Related story: Patch columnist talks to woman who launched national effort

Thousands of consumers in southeastern Wisconsin who have switched from banks to credit unions in the last month are encouraging others to follow suit as part of Bank Transfer Day Saturday.

Credit unions — unlike big banks — are non-profits that are owned by their members and have no stockholders. They offer the same services as banks, including checking and savings accounts, credit cards, loans and trusts.

Riding a movement that grew out of Bank of America's since-retracted debit card charge, and gained traction with the unaffiliated Occupy Wall Street protests and plenty of local organizers, Bank Transfer Day has been a powerful social media campaign with more than 75,000 "attendees" on its Facebook event.

"This is really just the tip of the iceberg," said Christine Henzig, director of communications for the Wisconsin Credit Union League, an association of more than 200 credit unions across the state. "It’s being passed friend to friend, family member to family member. Bank Transfer Day is just one small manifestation of a larger public awakening of the value of owning your financial institution."

Credit unions see spike in membership

The Credit Union National Association estimated that 14,700 new members joined credit unions in Wisconsin in the month following Bank of America's announcement of its $5 debit card charge on Sept. 29.

According a CUNA survey, credit unions gained 650,000 new members nationwide between Sept. 29 and Oct. 29 — more than the number of people who joined in all of 2010.

More than 80 percent of credit unions surveyed attributed member growth to consumer reaction to new bank fees, and the movement surrounding Bank Transfer Day.

Louise Ptacek, who opened an account Friday at the Educators Credit Union, said she switched from M&I Bank because she was angered when M&I executives received a $95 million package in payouts after the bank was purchased July 5 by the Bank of Montreal.

"At some point, enough is enough," Ptacek said. "I like that the credit union is a non-profit."

Jim Henderson, vice president of marketing at the Educators Credit Union, said while the organization generally aims for 5 percent annual increases in membership, there was a 25 percent jump between between last October and this one. The credit union has branches throughout the Milwaukee area — including Glendale, Greenfield, Milwaukee and Waukesha.

But that isn't the only local credit union seeing an uptick in membership.

Landmark Credit Union, which serves about 172,000 members in southeastern Wisconsin and branches in Brookfield, Oak Creek, Sussex, Waukesha and Wauwatosa, had a net gain of 945 members in October, 733 of whom opened checking accounts.

"That's much higher than normal," said Pat Ransom, vice president of marketing.

Ransom credited Landmark's free checking accounts, which have no minimum balance or monthly fees and offer 7.5 percent interest on the first $500, for attracting so many members in a rough economic time.

Henzig said she isn't surprised by the recent trend, considering that credit unions gained their most members during the Great Depression.

"There’s no surprise now that in these challenging times, people are coming back to that," Henzig said. "It’s nothing new. They’re coming home."

Henzig said because a credit union is a non-profit owned by its members, and operated by a volunteer board of directors, profits are cycled back into the credit union to provide savings for its members.

Henzig said when she and her husband refinanced their car loan with a credit union, it cost them $14 and saved them $850.

"Do they have to do that? No," Henzig said. "They could have handed that profit to shareholders, but credit unions don’t have shareholders. There is no small group sitting in an ivory tower looking for profits."

The Co-op Factor

Not everyone making the switch is looking primarily for savings.

"For me it's about keeping money local, in a not-for-profit environment," said Sobol, an English lecturer at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and the Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design. "That's a cause I can get down with. I'm hoping savings will be the icing on the proverbial cake."

This is where the Bank Transfer Day movement collides with the Occupy movement, and similar-intentioned protests against Gov. Scott Walker. 

"I would trace it back to the battle against Walker," Sobol said. "Walker and others, by underegulating industry, they’re making it possible for mega-banks and mega-corporations to dominate local communities."

At the Brewery Credit Union, which covers nine counties in southeastern Wisconsin, CEO Jim Schrimpf said the organization's mission is to build financial assets in lower-income communities in Milwaukee, offering a "fresh start account" to those who've been locked out of the banking system for overdrafting.

"Anything we make above operating expenses, that flows back to the community," said Schrmipf, whose organization has branches in Milwaukee, Waukesha and Greenfield.

Schrimpf said the bank also has many middle- to high-income members joining who want to invest in the community. He said the credit union has seen its biggest spike in membership numbers in the last month since they opened its Bay View location six years ago.

"We can't put away the membership packets because as soon as we put them away we have to take them back out," he said.

  • Do you plan to switch banks anytime soon?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes. I'm going to switch to another bank.
        11 (6%)
    • Yes. I'm moving to a credit union.
        48 (28%)
    • No. I'm happy where I'm at.
        25 (14%)
    • I'm already at a credit union.
        85 (50%)
    Total votes: 169
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Bank Transfer Day, Bank of America, Credit Unions, and bank fees

Craig

11:02 am on Saturday, November 5, 2011

The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee has an idiot professor in Sobol...If he thinks Walker is to blame for a National Issue with Banking fees, he doesn;t belong in a classroom. Makes me wonder what kind of education the kids at UWM are getting if he can not comprehend the real reason for the fees.
Banks are evil, so too are educators who can't see the forest for the trees.
The UW system should send this guy packing...

Reply

MDS

12:13 pm on Saturday, November 5, 2011

Craig, Sobol is an English lecturer, not a professor, and not in business, political science or economics. And you want to have him fired for a personal opinion that you don't share? So much for academic freedom or freedom of speech. Plus he said "Walker and others" he's not saying its all Walker's fault, but Walker is the personification of this battle in Wisconsin. Recall Walker!

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

3:09 pm on Saturday, November 5, 2011

@MDS -

Sobol is privy to his opinion, so long as he doesn't make it a part of his curriculum. Partisan politics has no place in the public classroom - period!

Comment_arrow

Craig

4:50 pm on Saturday, November 5, 2011

MDS...Lecturer or whatever...still a steaming pile -about as useful as you recall Walker wackoes.
Even if he is recalled after 1 year he will have left the state better of than when he took over the helm. How did Doyle do for you?

Comment_arrow

235301

9:25 am on Sunday, November 6, 2011

I can respect the opinion of someone who is on the other side of the debate if they are well informed, if the opinion is well thought out. Diversity of opinion is good. Well informed opinion is good. Ill-informed opinion is bad. Blaming Walker for this, he might as well have blamed aliens because both opinions have the same level of credibility. Clearly the level of froth on the left has reached a fever pitch. You have idiots like this guy blaming Walker for something that isn't even remotely under his control. And you had the recall idiots blaming Darling for cutting Medicare.

Keith Schmitz

7:56 pm on Saturday, November 5, 2011

For those of you who hold the pleasing idea that the economic crash was caused by mortgages to black people and gay members of Congress -- ht.ly/7kenc

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

8:44 pm on Saturday, November 5, 2011

Keith, unless that's some new cryptic code for "go you-know-what yourself" you came up with, your link is hosed.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

11:32 pm on Saturday, November 5, 2011

@Bob -

I think it's some kind of new liberal web domain that's only available if you have your web browser set-up to transmit the top secret lib handshake from your terminal. Oh wait, what's that - conservatives typically don't buy into conspiracy theories? Right, got it. Never mind, it's probably just Keith's own way of saying of what you've already pointed out.

However, I'm surprised to see that Keith is reducing the issue to a matter of race and sexual preference, without being manipulated to do so by any other posted comment and without any supporting proof/evidence what-so-ever to support why he is going there.

Nice job Keith! You actually out-raced AWD. However, usually AWD at least makes a decent point with valid concerns, albeit even if he's inarticulate with such points and concerns. But Keith's reduction of this issue to such trivial qualifiers is just beyond all reasonable comprehension!

Who knew it was possible? :-)

Comment_arrow

m

9:32 am on Sunday, November 6, 2011

The link works fine for me. Try:

http://ht.ly/7kenc

Comment_arrow

M.S.

10:38 am on Sunday, November 6, 2011

Whats worse, @Keiths off topic comment, or the rhetoric of @Bob McBride & @James R Hoffa's response?

Gee, does everything have to deteriorate to off topic ill founded rhetoric based insults on comment boards?

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

2:29 pm on Sunday, November 6, 2011

@M.S. -

Obviously, you couldn't tell, so I'll let you in on a little secret - I was being sarcastic when referencing the link, trying to inject a little humor into the conversation! Lighten up already!

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

5:19 pm on Sunday, November 6, 2011

m, ordinarily when one posts a link, one does so that it can be clicked on, as you did and as I'm doing here:

http://grassrootsnorthshore.org/?p=1856

Keith was probably busy rushing around making last minute preparations for tonight's shindig (which I'm more than happy to promote for him, via the convenient and easy-to-use hyperlink above), when he fat-fingered the URL last night.

If you hurry, you can still make it in time to get a seat. Rumor has it over 9000 are expected to attend, but I think that's a bit on the high side.

Jay Sykes

6:13 am on Sunday, November 6, 2011

This is my kind of protest. These people are doing something for their own economic self interest without making a big scene;screaming shame,shame,shame;costing $8 million in police services;expecting/demanding everything for free;defecating on public property......

Reply

Ray Ray Johnson

6:43 am on Sunday, November 6, 2011

This thread is like 3 people with Down's Syndrome fighting over the missing 23rd Chromosome like it's a wishbone. In the end, still short a chromosome, no matter how much chicken bone you're holding.

Reply

M.S.

10:36 am on Sunday, November 6, 2011

In response to @AWD's deleted comment & @ James R Hoffa's critique:

I do stand corrected.

"Officials said the plan won't cost taxpayers any money." It is a loan guarantee with a plan to pay back the money. Still a fraction of what taxpayers are paying for the for-profit banks that will only be partially paid back. In other words, a larger front end public investment, with a smaller (percentage wise) return.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

2:42 pm on Sunday, November 6, 2011

@M.S. -

I never critiqued this issue - I merely provided some supporting evidence to AWD's now deleted comment. BTW - Does anyone know why AWD's posts always seem to get deleted from the Patch? And if you do some research, you'll find other credit unions that were bailed out by the fed just like the banks you're referencing.

In fact, I've been a member of credit unions over banks for most of my life.

Also, most of the big Wall Street banks didn't need or want TARP funds, it was forced upon them by team Paulson/Geithner. And most of those banks already paid all of those funds back with interest. The for-profit banks that are hosing the tax-payers tend to be the smaller regional and community commercial banks and the GSE’s such as Fannie, Freddie, and Ginnie. After all, let's be fair if we're going to be setting the story straight here.

James R Hoffa

2:48 pm on Sunday, November 6, 2011

Also, for the record, I fully support this tactic, as it's a viable market based solution and encourages competition. And it's far more productive than just marching in the streets, perpetrating violence, and starting stuff with cops just to gain media attention.

Reply

Zelda Crusher

1:19 pm on Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Rory, I think you mean "citing".

Reply

Leave a comment